Marketing Myopia Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Marketing Myopia - Essay ExampleA growth constancy builds its success by replacement a previous utility or product and it is at risk of such alike risk of replacement by future innovations. Thinking after-school(prenominal) the box is not some initiative to make a difference or of being creative. Rather, it is a crucial component of every organizations attempt for competitive advantage and survival. Levitt argued that there is really no such thing as a growth industry because everything works deep down a cyclical process. Here, an industry or a business may assume its strength because of the unchallenged superiority of the product, which displaced another that it has substituted. His evidences are legitimate and numerous. He cited the experiences of many an(prenominal) industries that were considered boom sectors but eventually declined after some(prenominal) years. The cycle features organizations and products constantly replacing another because of wrong management perspecti ve. The examples provided were the dry cleaning industry, the railroad industry and the grocery stores. Levitt also predicted that the electric utilities and gadgetry is in danger of the same trouble because technologies will then be discovered to suffer newer and more efficient products. The liking is that when managers fail to think outside the box beyond the periphery of their visions, their products tend to be swallowed by the cycle. On the other hand, once management think astir(predicate) the future and the decline of their product so that they are able to provide solutions and new innovations that will replace their own, competitors will have less opportunities for competitive advantage. more of Levitts arguments are anchored on one simple principle that survival for industries rests on perspectives. There are industries that are focused on their products and, hence, myopic in their management models. For example, the railroad company was focused on their product, which is the railroad. Had they opted to adopt a perspective that went beyond it, they would have thought about their business as that of shipping and, hence, was able to prevent the decline of their profits. Personally, I have experienced this myopia on account of my work experiences with three industries. For example, I worked for an Auto dealership several years ago. Now the management of this organization has been focused much on automobiles. For several months of my stay, I saw how such singularity in objective has put up the sales of the organization. Clients are not only interested in cars but they look for things and services that go with it. For example, when sales people have everything there is to neck about cars, we cannot answer questions about technology like how their mobile phones can be integrated with car accessories, for example. This is because we did not have them no products offered beyond cars and, hence, we cannot offer services, much less the know-how. So fewe r clients came to visit because we cannot offer more. The clients did not come because they did not want to. There was no reason to. This was also the same with some companies in the moving and storage company, which I was connected with for a time. There was a lot of opportunities either as additional services within moving and storage and related and new products and services that could have been served and provided customers the value and convenience of having many services at one outlet or in a single transaction. I can see many other industries not cited in the article that display marketing myopia. For example, there is the